The Blood of the Heroes of Manassas

The Belgic Confession
Article 36: The Civil Government

We believe that because of the depravity of the human race our good God has ordained kings, princes, and civil officers. He wants the world to be governed by laws and policies so that human lawlessness may be restrained and that everything may be conducted in good order among human beings.
For that purpose he has placed the sword in the hands of the government, to punish evil people and protect the good.

And being called in this manner to contribute to the advancement of a society that is pleasing to God, the civil rulers have the task, subject to God’s law, of removing every obstacle to the preaching of the gospel and to every aspect of divine worship.

They should do this while completely refraining from every tendency toward exercising absolute authority, and while functioning in the sphere entrusted to them, with the means belonging to them.

And the government’s task is not limited to caring for and watching over the public domain but extends also to upholding the sacred ministry, with a view to removing and destroying all idolatry and false worship of the Antichrist; to promoting the kingdom of Jesus Christ; and to furthering the preaching of the gospel everywhere; to the end that God may be honored and served by everyone, as he requires in his Word.

Moreover everyone, regardless of status, condition, or rank, must be subject to the government, and pay taxes, and hold its representatives in honor and respect, and obey them in all things that are not in conflict with God’s Word, praying for them that the Lord may be willing to lead them in all their ways and that we may live a peaceful and quiet life in all piety and decency.

And on this matter we denounce the Anabaptists, other anarchists, and in general all those who want to reject the authorities and civil officers and to subvert justice by introducing common ownership of goods and corrupting the moral order that God has established among human beings.

October 28, 312:

According to tradition, on this date the 32-year-old Roman emperor Constantine defeated Maxentius at Milvian Bridge. Before the battle, Constantine had seen the symbol of Jesus, chi-rho, in a vision, accompanied with the words “By this sign conquer.” He is considered Rome’s first Christian emperor (see issue 57: Converting the Empire).

 

[Nehemiah 10:30 NIV  "We promise not to give our daughters in marriage to the peoples around us or take their daughters for our sons."]
RNC Under Fire For Wacist NObama Picture
Hip-Hop Wired -
The Publican National Committee’s Facebook page raised eyebrows after a wacist picture appeared on the group’s fan page. A “fan” of the committee posted a …

 

[AMALGAMATION HAS BEEN THE GOAL EVER SINCE THE TOWER OF BABEL: "And this apparently is the destiny which our conquerors have in view. If indeed they can mix the blood of the heroes of Manassas with this vile stream from the fens of Africa, then they will never again have occasion to tremble before the righteous resistance of Virginia freemen; but will have a race supple and vile enough to fill that position of political subjection, which they desire to fix on the South." ~ Robert L. Dabney]
Things I Learned From the Harvard Racist Test
FunnyCrave.com -
And all this time I’ve been using the abundance of Confederate Army memoribilia in my bathroom as a measuring stick? Nice! Where do I sign up? …

 

[ALL THE DIFFERNECE IN THE WORLD WHEN THE STATE GOV CALLED OUT THE MILITIA WITH Washington: The Indispensable Man COMMANDIN', AND THE ILLEGAL, IMPERIAL, UNJUST & UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTIONS OF APE LINCOLN AND THE REST OF THE "IMPERIAL PRESI-DUNCES" SINCE!!!]
National Emergencies
TIME
In 1794, President Washington personally commanded a Militia and used it to suppress a rebellion against a federal whiskey tax. Although he did not use the …

 

[WHAT PART OF FREE SPEECH DO THE COLOURED COMMIES NOT UNDERSTAND???]
NAACP Joins Fight Against Noose Hanging In Yard
CBS13.com - ‎
The Watt Avenue home drew criticism almost immediately after displaying a noose in the same display as a Confederate Flag, and members of the National …

 

[lol ---> THE ORIGINAL SERPENT IN THE GARDEN???  WE STILL LIKE IT HOT!!!]
Prehistoric titanic-snake jungles laughed at global warming
Rainforest similar to ours flourished at 3-5° hotter
By Lewis Page •
Fossil boffins say that dense triple-canopy rainforests, home among other things to gigantic one-tonne boa constrictors, flourished millions of years ago in temperatures 3-5°C warmer than those seen today - as hot as some of the more dire global-warming projections.

 

[DIG THE ROTTEN YANKEE CORPSES UP AND DUMP THEM IN THE CESSPOOL OF JEW YORK CITY, AND TAKE THEIR LIVIN' CARPETBAGGER KIN & NEGRO AND SCALAWAG ALLIES WIT' 'EM!!!]
Grave Matters
Wall Street Journal -
After seizing Arlington, the northern Virginia plantation of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee, federal officials in 1863 levied a tax of …

 

[REMEMBER WHEN THE EMPIRE USED TO BE WHITE???]
ESPN Suspends Inveterate Wacist Bob Griese, To Delight of PC Fascists
HoopsWorld - ‎
Bob Griese mistook Juan Pablo Montoya for a MeHican. Montoya is Columbian. Griese could be old Whitey mistaking all latin AmeriKans for MeHicans,
…
I could see the outrage if he said something about “picking fruit” or “hanging out in front of Home Depot with the day laborers.”  But, he didn’t.  We’re hardly in “black-skinned stormtroopers” territory here.

 

[Y'ALL NEED MORE THAN A DEER RIFLE & PICK-UP TRUCK WHEN THE CALL FER VOLUNTEER PATRIOTS GOES OUT: GIT Y'ALLS GEAR READY!!!]
Sipsey Street Irregulars: Praxis: FM 21-15 Care and Use of …
By Dutchman6
For fifteen years I have been a practioner of the art of militia logistics, helping newbies get accoutered with whatever level of comabt harness and support gear they could afford. Still, once we get them outfitted we must teach them …

 

[WE WERE & ARE SOUTHRON!!!]
RE: Jackson
OmniNerd (blog) -
He was a Confederate general. Did the Confederacy consider themselves AmeriKan or Confederates or both? Whether they did or not doesn’t matter as I assume …

 

[AS USUAL THE MARXIST MEDIA DRAW THE WRONG CONCLUSIONS WHEN THEY OCCASIONALLY REPORT THE FACTS CORRECTLY.  ROTFLOL!!! ---> RECKON IT'S GOT ANYTHANG TO DO WITH I.Q.???]
Studies find latino toddlers lag White children in cognitive skills
The findings highlight the necessity of early intervention such as Head Start, researchers say. [GIVE US MORE $$$!!!]
The Los Angeles Times -
Poor immigrant latinas have healthy babies, but by age 2 or 3, their toddlers begin to lag behind White middle-class children in vocabulary, listening and problem-solving skills, according to two studies released Tuesday.
Researchers call it the “immigrant paradox”: Pregnant latino women smoke and drink less than pregnant White and african AmeriKan women, Latino newborns have lower infant mortality rates, and the cognitive skill of infants 9 to 15 months are about equal for White and latino children.
But by the time they are toddlers, latino children trail their White counterparts by up to six months in understanding words, speaking in more complex sentences and performing such simple tasks as assembling puzzles.

************************

[THE BIRTH OF A LEGEND: "Then, Sir, we will give them the bayonet!"  OF STONEWALL AND THE REAL REASON THEY DON'T WANT OUR ""ASSAULT RIFLES"" TO HAVE A KNIFE ON THE END  ---> THEY'RE SKEERED OF COLD STEEL!!!]
Gods and Generals - First Manassas
lordwilson100

************************

[LONG, BUT WELL WORTH READIN' THIS REVIEW AND I WONDER IF THEIR IS A SOUTHERN {or English!!!} TRANSLATION SOMEWHERE.  IT SEEMS OVERDONE IN A PLACE OR 2, AND THE REVIEW MISSES THE ESSENCE OF WESTERN CIVILISATION WHICH IS THE BLEND OF CELTO-GERMANIC TRIBALISM WITH ROMAN CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISM ---> Matthew 6:33 "But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you." RULIN' THE WORLD WAS AN AFTER EFFECT OF CHRISTIAN BLESSIN', EVEN FER THOSE IN PSEUDO-CHRISTIAN POPISH LANDS.  BY THE TURN OF THE CENTURY BEFORE LAST, THE WEST WAS LARGELY SOCIALIST & HUMANIST, AND, THAT IS THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM OF THE POST-CHRISTIAN, POST-MODERN WORLD ...]
Foundations of the Twenty-First Century
Michael O’Meara
A White Nationalist Reading of . . .

Dominique Venner
Le Siècle de 1914: Utopies, guerres et révolutions en Europe au XXe siècle
Paris: Pygmalion, 2006

“To recreate a new aristocracy is the eternal task of every revolutionary project.” –Guillaume Faye

At the beginning of twentieth century, peoples of European descent ruled the world. They made up a third of its population, occupied half its landmass, controlled Africa, India, Southeast Asia, and parts of coastal China; their industry and technology, along with their philosophy, science, and art, had no rival; the world was theirs and theirs alone.

A century later, all was changed: Peoples of European descent had fallen to less than 9 percent of the world’s population; their lands were everywhere inundated by non-Whites; their industry and technology outsourced to potential enemies; their state, social system, and media taken over by parasitic aliens; and, in the deepest demographic sense, they faced the not-too-distant prospect of biological extinction.

To understand this catastrophic inversion requires some understanding of the period responsible for it. We’re fortunate that after a lifetime studying its key movements, Dominique Venner, our greatest identitarian historian, has set out to chart its biopolitical contours.

Before the Deluge

As a historical (rather than a chronological) period, the twentieth century begins in 1914, with the onset of the First World War, whose devastating assault on European existence shook the continent in every one of its foundations, destroying not just its ancien régime, but ushering in what Ernst Nolte calls the “European Civil War” of 1917-45 or what some call the “Thirty Years War” of 1914-45. For amidst its storms of fire and steel, there emerged four rival ideologies — American liberalism, Russian Communism, Italian Fascism, and German National Socialism — each of whose ambition was to reshape the postwar order according to its own scheme for collective salvation. Our world, Venner argues, is a product of these contentious ambitions and of the ideological system — liberalism — that prevailed over its rivals.

Before the war of 1914 political ideologies lacked the “religious” [WHAT, REMEMBER THE WARS OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION???] fervor of their twentieth-century counterparts. Europe then was more than a geographic assortment of different peoples and states identified with different political creeds. It constituted a single biocivilization (a Race-Nation), whose ethnonational variants embodied alternative facets of the genetic-spiritual legacy bequeathed by the Greeks, the Aryans, and the Cro Magnons. [???] Not a single great phenomenon experienced by any one European people, it followed, was not also experienced by the others: From the megalithic culture of the stone age, to medieval chivalry, to the rise of nationalism. In the modern period, the ties of blood and spirit linking the different European nations took institutional form in the Westphalian state system of 1648, which, with the exception of the revolutionary period (1789-1815), limited their numerous wars and conflicts to family disputes.

The greatest casualty of what contemporaries called the Great War would be the destruction of this system — and of the aristocratic elites who were its incarnation.

On the war’s eve, the aristocracy still represented that historic body whose function was to command, to fight, and to defend. In fact, in one form or another, it had always dominated European life — at least since the Aryans, that offshoot of the White race whose existence was premised on the rule of the “noble.” Though property-based and attached to the permanances of family, tradition, and rank, the pre-war aristocracy bore little resemblance to the decadent hereditary ruling class of liberal historiography. For Venner, it was, as an ideal type, an ever-renewing estate infused with the spirit of honor, duty, and loyalty to what was highest in White existence. As such, it typified its people’s essence, associating nobility with those who put their people’s interests before their own.

Except for republican France and Switzerland, all of Europe’s pre-war monarchical and imperial states were governed by aristocrats, whose Prussian spirit exalted simplicity, austerity, duty, and political incorruptibility. Against the leveling aspersions cast by liberals and democrats, Venner emphasizes the aristocracy’s dynamic, modernist, and genial character — opposed in essence to bourgeois democratic societies, which subordinate everyone to money (the realm of the jews).

Cataclysm

No one in 1914 quite understood the type of the war they had gotten into. All the general staffs anticipated a short, decisive engagement like the “cabinet wars” of the eighteenth and ninteenth centuries — not realizing it might resemble the American War of Succession, [I THINK THEY MEAN THE SECESSION WAR--GUESS IT LOST SOMETHIN' IN THE TRANSLATION FROM THE FRENCH ...]whose closing stages anticipated the “Second-Generation War” of 1914 (a generation of war based on massed firepower, where “artillery conquers, infantry occupies”).

Though a traditional conflict between rival states at the start, by 1917, once the United States entered it, the war had been transformed not just into an industrial and social mobilization of unprecedented scope, but into an ideological crusade between democratic and authoritarian regimes. Worse, the democratic crusaders wouldn’t let the war end the way previous European wars had ended, when the jus publicum europaeum of the Westphalian system mitigated White strife and ensured the integrity of rival states. [AGAIN, REMEMBER NAPOLEON???] In the absence of this noble restraint, Europe was mutilated at its core: Nine million combatants were killed, the Hohenzollern, Hapsburg, and Romanov empires shattered, and an even greater hecatomb prepared for the next generation.

In the glow of this holocaust, Woodrow Wilson, the AmeriKan champion of an anti-aristocratic, anti-European “democratism,” stepped upon the Old World’s stage to proclaim a new order based on liberal governance, free markets, and the egalitarian principle that the sovereign individual takes precedence over community, culture, history, and (in time) race — an order whose underlying principle rested on the rule of money — and, though Venner doesn’t say it, on money’s Chosen Ones.

The untenable Wilsonian settlement of 1918-19 collapsed soon enough, but it was hastened, in some cases provoked, by its ideological rivals. For Wilson’s plutocratic democracy did not go unopposed. In Russia, Communists proposed a more radically egalitarian version of his liberal utopia, a version whose methods differed from America’s market principles, but nevertheless upheld the same raceless materialist commitments born of Enlightenment liberalism. In Germany and Italy, a defensive Europeanism gave rise to more forthrightly anti-liberal ideologies to challenge the anti-Aryan or Jewish ethic of American capitalism and Russian Communism.

In this spirit, Mussolini’s Fascists called for a strong state exalting “authority, order, and justice” to unite Italian producers and soldiers in a national destiny free of the community-killing forces of liberal individualism and Communist collectivism. In a [VERY!!!] different way, Hitler’s National Socialists fought for a racial order, a Volksgemeinschaft, to overturn the Diktat of the Wilsonian peace, beat back the liberals’ assault on the body and spirit of the nation, and return Germany to its rightful place on the world stage. Both these movements opposing the anti-White [??? WHAT DID THEY DO TO THE WHITE SLAVS???] subversions of the Wilsonians and Leninists did so, despite their plebeian-Caesarian politics, in a spirit akin to Europe’s ancient warrior aristocracies, whose tradition exalted personal power and regalian purpose.

…